Re: Web server update problem

• To: "Brian W. Spolarich" <briansp@ans.net>
• Subject: Re: Web server update problem
• From: Pete Shipley <shipley@dis.org>
• Date: Sat, 17 Feb 1996 14:24:18 -0800
• cc: www-security@ns2.rutgers.edu
• In-reply-to: Your message of Sat, 17 Feb 1996 10:28:41 -0500. <Pine.SOL.3.91.960217102409.26331B-100000@thebrain.aa.ans.net>

>On Fri, 16 Feb 1996, Frode Hoem wrote:
>
>> Security of the web-server is important, therefore some kind of
>>  authorization mechanism is needed. Probably that would be 
>>  Kerberos or a smart-card solution, any thoughts on this ?
>
>  Bringing up a Kerberos server doesn't involve too much overhead. 
>Ideally its a dedicated piece of hardware (BSDI on a Pentium is 
>reasonably inexpensive) that only does Kerberos.


What kind of load does Kerberos put on a system?
I was under the impression that is is fairly light
and you single 486 server can support a large campus without
much of a load.
		
		-Pete

• Re: Web server update problem
• From: Icarus Sparry <ccsis@bath.ac.uk>
• Re: Web server update problem
• From: "Brian W. Spolarich" <briansp@ans.net>

• Re: Web server update problem
• From: "Brian W. Spolarich" <briansp@ans.net>

• Previous: S-HTTP Drafts
• Next: Re: Web server update problem
• Index(es):
  • Index
  • Thread